\begin{table}[h!]
\centering
\caption{Engagement Attitude} 
\label{tab:Engagement Attitude}
\scalebox{0.8}{
\begin{tabular}{llllllll}
  \hline
\textbf{Outcome} & \textbf{Type} & \textbf{N} & \textbf{Estimate} & \textbf{SE} & \textbf{p-value} & \textbf{Ctrl. Mean} & \textbf{Ctrl. SD} \\ 
  \hline
Index & --- & 11,868 &  0.10*** & 0.02 & $<$0.001 & -0.00 & 1.00 \\ 
  Correct Friend & Question & 11,947 &  0.01 & 0.02 & 0.796 & -0.00 & 1.00 \\ 
  Not Share Friend's Misinformation & Question & 11,917 &  0.11*** & 0.02 & $<$0.001 & 0.00 & 1.00 \\ 
  Fact Checking Important & Question & 12,007 & -0.02 & 0.02 & 0.243 & 0.00 & 1.00 \\ 
  Fact Checked Recently & Question & 12,007 &  0.10*** & 0.02 & $<$0.001 & 0.00 & 1.00 \\ 
   \hline\\[-0.9em]
\multicolumn{8}{l}{\begin{minipage}{1.2\textwidth}\small Note: This table reports treatment effects on engagement attitude, including the index as well as sub-index items. ICW was used to construct indices. Estimated using OLS regressions with library-spillover strata fixed effects and standard-errors clustered at the classroom level. All indices are standardized with respect to the control group mean and standard deviation. *p$<$0.05; **p$<$0.01; ***p$<$0.001.\end{minipage}} \\
\end{tabular}
}
\end{table}
